Global Meterologists Sunning in Cancun While Meeting On Climate Change

It was reported in the mainstream media that while the U.S. is still facing its greatest domestic recession since the Great Depression, the globalists UN members, many flying on their private jets, are meeting in Cancun, Mexico to "study" climate change.

Below is a quotation from the mainstream media article on the meeting verbatim:

"The meeting comes as a new report by the U.N.'s weather agency, the World Meteorological Organization, says greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere have reached their highest levels since pre-industrial times. These gases, which warm the Earth's surface, continued to build up in 2009 -- the latest year studied -- despite the economic slowdown, said the the report last week."

Now we have a World Meterological Organization, in addition to the World Health Organization?

And interesting to note that the quote references that "gas levels in the atmosphere have reached their highest levels since pre-industrial times," while also stating that they "continue to build up...DESPITE the economic slowdown."

Hello? If the first statement has any factual basis (and who knows since such measurements were not even measured in pre-industrial times, so what a hoot!), then the second statement would stand to reason that if there is an "economic slowdown" in industry, then the levels WOULD rise to levels which were present in the pre-industrial era.

What a conundrum, and what spin!

I wonder how many golfing games, and windsurfing events are on the agenda for these globalists while "meeting" in Cancun?

Climate change? Isn't change in climate the norm? And is there nothing as unpredictable as the weather? And just how accurate are meterologists in general on the daily changes in weather, much less in being able to predict what MIGHT occur hundreds or even thousands of years from now?

I wonder are these some of the same meterologists that were unable to predict the correct path of Hurricane Gustav before it hit landfall back in 2008?

I wonder if in truth they are meeting to plan the next "natural" disaster to then build up the control of the global economy instead through the World Bank? I mean, if you can seed clouds for agricultural purposes at this point in history to protect the food sources, could you not also "overseed" those clouds in order to facilitate a hurricane, say, in order to justify your existence, and feed the global bankers once again?

What politics. What spin. What utter baloney.

Maybe they are meeting with the drug cartel members, perhaps, instead?

McCain, Hayworth Race Demonstrates Need For True Change

As a demonstration of the need for a true rewind and reinstituting the "campaign finance reform" that the founders envisioned, you need look no further than the current mud-slinging by two in one of the mainstream political parties for the Senate race in Arizona between the incumbent, John McCain, and a "viable" challenger, J.D. Hayworth.

Both have taken the low route and slung mud implicating both in illicit and illegal campaign contributions (when both accept out of district funding, so both are fundamentally in violation of the founders intent for a representative government from the outset, as are all candidates from that other corporate party, the "Democrats.").

Both represent corporate special interests due to their soliciting "bundlers" that are not even residents of the State of Arizona. Hayworth and McCain had out of district "bundlers" working for their campaigns, in clear violation of the Constitution's intent.

Both are affiliated with "corporate" political parties, diametrically opposed in their agendas to the stated law of the land, the U.S. Constitution in their platforms - and represent "corporate" interests most of all, not their true constituency.

And neither spent their formative years in Arizona, and thus were and are "carpetbaggers" if anything. Hayworth from North Carolina, and McCain from Virginia primarily.

The "representative" function of federal state representatives such s Senators, at this point in our history, wouldn't you think, would require a longer history there than a Ms. Clinton, Mr. McCain or Mr. Hayworth.

Since they are, after all, representing the state and should have a long term association with its history, not Washington's political games.

Formative years create the attachment, not deeds.

Much is rotten in Arizona, and those that talk the talk but don't walk the walk, are not worth listening to or voting for.

Which may be why the State of Arizona, at one point, had an initiative which would have created a lottery for those that participated in the voting process.

Since so many have come to the same conclusion I have, none of them represent me, or the Constitution.

And oaths of office demonstrate fealty and loyalty, not political parties.